![]() ![]() No objections to the ruling were stated, so it's official and final. Furthermore, the non guilty verdict was recommended by the prosecution. They specifically state that the perpetrators Turkish ancestry did not matter. They came to this conclusion, because of the victims repeated statements that she could not assert that the perpetrator acted with intent to rape, but thought it was consensual sex. They came to the result that intent could not be proven. Summarized it states they talked to 7 witnesses including the victim. Please read some comments on the story for more information.Įdit: Okay since some people here do not believe me or still think the OP and especially the headline are not misleading. The court could not establish this intent because the victim herself stated that it is possible that the perpetrator saw it as consensual sex (see quote in the OP). There was no conviction because the court could not establish that there was intent, which is required for it to be considered as rape. There's more to this story and the headline is misleading.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |